FAG 6197 Bearing — Specifications, Dimensions & Cross-Reference
The FAG 6197 is a deep groove ball bearing manufactured by FAG. It belongs to the 619 series and features dimensions of 35 × 62 × 14 mm (bore × OD × width). This bearing has a dynamic load rating of 16,000 N and a static load rating of 10,300 N, making it suitable for medium-duty applications.
Technical Specifications
| Dimensions | |
|---|---|
| Bore Diameter (d) | 35 mm |
| Outside Diameter (D) | 62 mm |
| Width (B) | 14 mm |
| Weight | 0.147 kg |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Dynamic Load Rating (Cr) | 16,000 N |
| Static Load Rating (C₀r) | 10,300 N |
| Limiting Speed (Grease) | 11,000 rpm |
| Limiting Speed (Oil) | 13,000 rpm |
Brand Cross-Reference — 6197 Equivalents
The following bearings from other manufacturers are interchangeable with the FAG 6197. All share identical dimensions (35×62×14mm) and comparable load ratings:
| Brand | Part Number | Dynamic Load (N) | Static Load (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAG | FAG 6197 ✦ | 16,000 | 10,300 |
| SKF | SKF 6197 | 16,000 | 10,300 |
| NTN | NTN 6197 | 16,000 | 10,300 |
| NACHI | NACHI 6197 | 16,000 | 10,300 |
| KOYO | KOYO 6197 | 16,000 | 10,300 |
| Timken | Timken 6197 | 16,000 | 10,300 |
| NSK | NSK 6197 | 16,000 | 10,300 |
| NTN | NTN 6197 | 16,000 | 10,300 |
| SKF | SKF 6197 | 16,000 | 10,300 |
Available Variants
The FAG 6197 base bearing is available in these configurations:
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the dimensions of the FAG 6197?
The FAG 6197 has a bore diameter of 35mm, outside diameter of 62mm, and width of 14mm. It weighs 0.147kg.
What is the load capacity of the FAG 6197?
The dynamic load rating (Cr) is 16,000 N and the static load rating (C₀r) is 10,300 N. The maximum recommended speed is 11,000 rpm with grease lubrication or 13,000 rpm with oil lubrication.
What bearings are equivalent to FAG 6197?
The 6197 is manufactured by multiple brands including SKF, NTN, NSK, FAG, Timken, KOYO, and NACHI. All versions share the same 35×62×14mm dimensions and are interchangeable in most applications. See the cross-reference table above for detailed comparisons.