FAG 6014 Bearing — Specifications, Dimensions & Cross-Reference
The FAG 6014 is a deep groove ball bearing manufactured by FAG. It belongs to the 6000 series and features dimensions of 70 × 110 × 20 mm (bore × OD × width). This bearing has a dynamic load rating of 31,500 N and a static load rating of 25,500 N, making it suitable for heavy-duty applications.
Technical Specifications
| Dimensions | |
|---|---|
| Bore Diameter (d) | 70 mm |
| Outside Diameter (D) | 110 mm |
| Width (B) | 20 mm |
| Weight | 0.510 kg |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Dynamic Load Rating (Cr) | 31,500 N |
| Static Load Rating (C₀r) | 25,500 N |
| Limiting Speed (Grease) | 5,600 rpm |
| Limiting Speed (Oil) | 6,700 rpm |
Brand Cross-Reference — 6014 Equivalents
The following bearings from other manufacturers are interchangeable with the FAG 6014. All share identical dimensions (70×110×20mm) and comparable load ratings:
| Brand | Part Number | Dynamic Load (N) | Static Load (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAG | FAG 6014 ✦ | 31,500 | 25,500 |
| Timken | Timken 6014 | 31,500 | 25,500 |
| SKF | SKF 6014 | 31,500 | 25,500 |
| NACHI | NACHI 6014 | 31,500 | 25,500 |
| KOYO | KOYO 6014 | 31,500 | 25,500 |
| Timken | Timken 6014 | 31,500 | 25,500 |
| NSK | NSK 6014 | 31,500 | 25,500 |
| NTN | NTN 6014 | 31,500 | 25,500 |
| SKF | SKF 6014 | 31,500 | 25,500 |
Available Variants
The FAG 6014 base bearing is available in these configurations:
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the dimensions of the FAG 6014?
The FAG 6014 has a bore diameter of 70mm, outside diameter of 110mm, and width of 20mm. It weighs 0.510kg.
What is the load capacity of the FAG 6014?
The dynamic load rating (Cr) is 31,500 N and the static load rating (C₀r) is 25,500 N. The maximum recommended speed is 5,600 rpm with grease lubrication or 6,700 rpm with oil lubrication.
What bearings are equivalent to FAG 6014?
The 6014 is manufactured by multiple brands including SKF, NTN, NSK, FAG, Timken, KOYO, and NACHI. All versions share the same 70×110×20mm dimensions and are interchangeable in most applications. See the cross-reference table above for detailed comparisons.