FAG 7210 Bearing — Specifications, Dimensions & Cross-Reference
The FAG 7210 is a angular contact ball bearing manufactured by FAG. It belongs to the 7200 series and features dimensions of 50 × 90 × 20 mm (bore × OD × width). This bearing has a dynamic load rating of 35,100 N and a static load rating of 23,200 N, making it suitable for heavy-duty applications.
Technical Specifications
| Dimensions | |
|---|---|
| Bore Diameter (d) | 50 mm |
| Outside Diameter (D) | 90 mm |
| Width (B) | 20 mm |
| Weight | 0.440 kg |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Dynamic Load Rating (Cr) | 35,100 N |
| Static Load Rating (C₀r) | 23,200 N |
| Limiting Speed (Grease) | 6,700 rpm |
| Limiting Speed (Oil) | 8,500 rpm |
Brand Cross-Reference — 7210 Equivalents
The following bearings from other manufacturers are interchangeable with the FAG 7210. All share identical dimensions (50×90×20mm) and comparable load ratings:
| Brand | Part Number | Dynamic Load (N) | Static Load (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAG | FAG 7210 ✦ | 35,100 | 23,200 |
| SKF | SKF 7210 | 35,100 | 23,200 |
| NTN | NTN 7210 | 35,100 | 23,200 |
| KOYO | KOYO 7210 | 35,100 | 23,200 |
| NACHI | NACHI 7210 | 35,100 | 23,200 |
| Timken | Timken 7210 | 35,100 | 23,200 |
| NSK | NSK 7210 | 35,100 | 23,200 |
| NTN | NTN 7210 | 35,100 | 23,200 |
| SKF | SKF 7210 | 35,100 | 23,200 |
Available Variants
The FAG 7210 base bearing is available in these configurations:
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the dimensions of the FAG 7210?
The FAG 7210 has a bore diameter of 50mm, outside diameter of 90mm, and width of 20mm. It weighs 0.440kg.
What is the load capacity of the FAG 7210?
The dynamic load rating (Cr) is 35,100 N and the static load rating (C₀r) is 23,200 N. The maximum recommended speed is 6,700 rpm with grease lubrication or 8,500 rpm with oil lubrication.
What bearings are equivalent to FAG 7210?
The 7210 is manufactured by multiple brands including SKF, NTN, NSK, FAG, Timken, KOYO, and NACHI. All versions share the same 50×90×20mm dimensions and are interchangeable in most applications. See the cross-reference table above for detailed comparisons.