FAG 7205 Bearing — Specifications, Dimensions & Cross-Reference
The FAG 7205 is a angular contact ball bearing manufactured by FAG. It belongs to the 7200 series and features dimensions of 25 × 52 × 15 mm (bore × OD × width). This bearing has a dynamic load rating of 14,800 N and a static load rating of 7,800 N, making it suitable for medium-duty applications.
Technical Specifications
| Dimensions | |
|---|---|
| Bore Diameter (d) | 25 mm |
| Outside Diameter (D) | 52 mm |
| Width (B) | 15 mm |
| Weight | 0.127 kg |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Dynamic Load Rating (Cr) | 14,800 N |
| Static Load Rating (C₀r) | 7,800 N |
| Limiting Speed (Grease) | 13,000 rpm |
| Limiting Speed (Oil) | 16,000 rpm |
Brand Cross-Reference — 7205 Equivalents
The following bearings from other manufacturers are interchangeable with the FAG 7205. All share identical dimensions (25×52×15mm) and comparable load ratings:
| Brand | Part Number | Dynamic Load (N) | Static Load (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAG | FAG 7205 ✦ | 14,800 | 7,800 |
| SKF | SKF 7205 | 14,800 | 7,800 |
| NTN | NTN 7205 | 14,800 | 7,800 |
| KOYO | KOYO 7205 | 14,800 | 7,800 |
| NACHI | NACHI 7205 | 14,800 | 7,800 |
| Timken | Timken 7205 | 14,800 | 7,800 |
| NSK | NSK 7205 | 14,800 | 7,800 |
| NTN | NTN 7205 | 14,800 | 7,800 |
| SKF | SKF 7205 | 14,800 | 7,800 |
Available Variants
The FAG 7205 base bearing is available in these configurations:
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the dimensions of the FAG 7205?
The FAG 7205 has a bore diameter of 25mm, outside diameter of 52mm, and width of 15mm. It weighs 0.127kg.
What is the load capacity of the FAG 7205?
The dynamic load rating (Cr) is 14,800 N and the static load rating (C₀r) is 7,800 N. The maximum recommended speed is 13,000 rpm with grease lubrication or 16,000 rpm with oil lubrication.
What bearings are equivalent to FAG 7205?
The 7205 is manufactured by multiple brands including SKF, NTN, NSK, FAG, Timken, KOYO, and NACHI. All versions share the same 25×52×15mm dimensions and are interchangeable in most applications. See the cross-reference table above for detailed comparisons.